Skip to content Skip to footer

US Moves to Bar Non-Compete Agreements in Employment Contracts

US Moves to Bar Non-Compete Agreements in Employment Contracts

In the United States, non-compete agreements have been a contentious issue in recent years, with many arguing that they limit job mobility and hinder economic growth. In response to these concerns, some states have moved to restrict or even ban non-compete agreements.

On July 9, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order calling on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to ban or limit the use of non-compete agreements. The order also directed the FTC to consider rules to make it easier for workers to change jobs and to increase competition among employers.

While the executive order does not have immediate legal effect, it signals the administration’s support for greater regulation of non-compete agreements. It remains to be seen how the FTC will respond and whether it will ultimately impose new restrictions on the use of non-compete agreements.

It’s worth noting that the authority to regulate non-compete agreements is primarily a matter of state law, and any federal action would likely be limited in scope. As of now, only a few states (including California, North Dakota, and Oklahoma) have outright bans on non-compete agreements, while others have varying degrees of restrictions on their use.

The Enforceability of Non-Compete Agreements for Employment Contracts in New York

In New York, non-compete agreements are generally enforceable if they are reasonable in scope and duration, meaning that they must be necessary to protect the legitimate business interests of the employer and not overly restrictive on the employee’s ability to find work in their field.

Under New York law, non-compete agreements must meet several requirements to be valid and enforceable:

  • The agreement must be supported by valid consideration, meaning that the employee must receive some benefit or consideration in exchange for agreeing to the non-compete.
  • The agreement must be reasonable in scope and duration, meaning that it must be no broader than necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate business interests, and the duration must be no longer than necessary to achieve that protection.
  • The agreement must protect a legitimate business interest, such as trade secrets, confidential information, or customer relationships.
  • The agreement must not be against public policy.

It’s worth noting that New York has historically been more skeptical of non-compete agreements than some other states, and courts in New York have been known to strike down agreements that are overly restrictive or not supported by a legitimate business interest.

If you have questions or concerns about a non-compete agreement in New York, contact J Avolio Law and attorney Jonathan Avolio can provide guidance based on the specific details of your situation.

Enforceability of Non-Compete Agreements for Employment Contracts in New Jersey

In New Jersey, non-compete agreements for employment are generally enforceable only to the extent that they are reasonable in scope and duration.

The New Jersey legislature has recognized that non-compete agreements can have a negative impact on employees’ ability to find new employment and that they can be anti-competitive in nature. As a result, non-compete agreements are generally disfavored in the state.

To be enforceable in New Jersey, a non-compete agreement must meet certain requirements, including:

  • Reasonable Scope: The non-compete agreement must be no broader than necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate interests, such as its trade secrets, confidential information, and customer relationships.
  • Reasonable Duration: The non-compete agreement must have a limited duration and cannot be indefinite. What is considered a reasonable duration will depend on the specific circumstances of each case.
  • Notice and Consideration: The employee must be given notice of the non-compete agreement before starting employment, and the agreement must be supported by valuable consideration (e.g., a job offer or a promotion).
  • No Undue Hardship: The non-compete agreement must not impose an undue hardship on the employee, such as by preventing them from working in their chosen profession or industry.

If a non-compete agreement is found to be overly broad or unreasonable, a court may refuse to enforce it, modify it, or declare it invalid. It’s important to note that while non-compete agreements can be difficult to enforce in New Jersey, they are not necessarily unenforceable in all cases.¬†

If you have questions or concerns about a non-compete agreement in New Jersey, contact J Avolio Law and attorney Jonathan Avolio can provide guidance based on the specific details of your situation.

Enforceability of Non-Compete Agreements for Employment Contracts in Pennsylvania 

In Pennsylvania, non-compete clauses for employment are generally enforceable if they are reasonable in scope and duration.

To be enforceable, a non-compete clause must be supported by valuable consideration, which could be a job offer or a promotion, and it must be designed to protect the employer’s legitimate interests, such as trade secrets, confidential information, and customer relationships.

The reasonableness of the scope and duration of the non-compete clause will depend on the specific circumstances of each case, including the employee’s job duties, the industry, and the geographic area in which the employer operates. In general, the scope and duration of a non-compete clause must be no broader than necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate interests.

Pennsylvania courts will typically consider the following factors when evaluating the reasonableness of a non-compete clause:

  • The geographic scope of the non-compete clause: A non-compete clause must be limited to the geographic area where the employer does business or has a legitimate interest in protecting.
  • The duration of the non-compete clause: A non-compete clause must be limited in duration to the time period necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate interests.
  • The scope of the non-compete clause: A non-compete clause must be limited to the specific type of employment or activity that would compete with the employer’s legitimate interests.
  • The hardship imposed on the employee: A non-compete clause cannot impose an undue hardship on the employee, such as by preventing them from working in their chosen profession or industry.

If a non-compete clause is found to be overly broad or unreasonable, a court may refuse to enforce it, modify it, or declare it invalid. 

If you have questions or concerns about a non-compete agreement in Pennsylvania, contact J Avolio Law and attorney Jonathan Avolio can provide guidance based on the specific details of your situation.

Leave a comment